Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/20/2003

State v. Rhodes

Citations

657 N.W.2d 823
2003 Minn. LEXIS 125
2003 WL 1342975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it was unlikely that the testimony of two new exculpatory witnesses would change the trial outcome when several witnesses and the physical evidence rebutted their testimony
noting that medical testimony about the cause of a victim's injuries \supports the jury's verdict\ and that the jury \apparently disregarded\ contrary medical testimony
stating that, if a defendant does not fulfill one prong of the Strickland test, the other prong need not be considered
explaining that we need not address both performance and prejudice if one factor is determinative of an ineffective-assistance claim
stating that consideration of both elements of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel is not required if one element is determinative
stating that a reviewing court need not address both Strickland prongs if one is dispositive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell A. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.