Skip to main content

State v. Webb

Citations

  • 824 P.2d 1257
  • 64 Wash. App. 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that any error in admitting a statement protected by the marital communications privilege was harmless
  • holding that the phrase “property of another,” as used in defining the comparable offense of malicious mischief, includes property co-owned by the defendant, or in which the defendant shares an interest
  • holding that property of another “includes property co-owned by the defendant”
  • where defendant asked if booking procedures were necessary, court held officer’s response “You’re damn right this -6- No. 79782-4-I/7 is necessary. You went in and vandalized Sheryl’s apartment” was not likely to elicit incriminating response

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pekelis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.