Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/31/2011

State v. Caldwell

Citations

803 N.W.2d 373
2011 Minn. LEXIS 545
2011 WL 3820717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the truncated recitation of the test in Warren “does not remove ‘not cumulative, impeaching, or doubtful’ from what must be proved”
explaining that the expressio unius canon is only justified when the language of the statute supports an inference that the omission was intentional
stating that “limited trial preparation” does not establish inadequate representation; the focus is on the adversarial process not the defendant’s assessment of counsel’s preparation
explaining that the expressio unius canon is only justified when the language of the statute supports an inference that the omission was intentional
affirming conviction of aiding and abetting first-degree premeditated murder for the benefit of a gang based on transferred intent
\We will not supply words that the Legislature either purposely omitted or inadvertently left out.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.