Oregon Supreme Court· 12/6/2018

State v. Warren

Citations

430 P.3d 1036
364 Or. 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the “purpose of the 1989 amend- ment was to expand the bases for joinder”
stating that alleging the basis for joinder is not difficult and that using the language of the joinder statute generally is sufficient
observing that the 1989 amendment to ORS 132.560 was based on Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (FRCrP) 8 and apparently “imported text from * * * FRCrP 8(a)
explaining that when read together, “the joinder and demurrer statutes establish a pleading requirement and a means for enforcing that requirement. The joinder statute requires that an indictment charge only one offense, unless an exception applies”
explaining that when read together, “the joinder and demurrer statutes establish a pleading requirement and a means for enforcing that requirement. The joinder statute requires that an indictment charge only one offense, unless an exception applies”
stating that, “for more than one hundred years, Oregon law has limited the number of offenses that can be charged in a single charging instrument and has required that charging instruments allege facts sufficient to demonstrate compliance with those limits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.