Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/6/1991

State v. Moeller

Citations

806 P.2d 130
105 Or. App. 434
1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that drug “scheme or network” crime seriousness enhancement factor was unconstitutionally vague
sustaining a facial vagueness challenge to a provision that increased the seriousness of cultivation, manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance, if the act was a part of a1 ‘scheme or network”
sustaining a facial vagueness challenge to a provision that increased the seriousness of cultivation, manufacture or delivery of a controlled substance, if the act was a part of a \scheme or network\
declaring the “common scheme or network” factor unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Joseph, Buttler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.