Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/5/2025

State v. Buck

Citations

566 P.3d 682
338 Or. App. 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that prosecutor’s brief misstatement of the law during closing rebuttal argument was curable had an objection been raised
holding that prosecutor’s brief misstatement of the law during closing rebuttal argument was curable had an objection been raised
where prosecutor’s rebuttal argument was improper because it misstated the law as to how the jury could view hearsay evidence, the defendant did not establish plain error because the argument was brief and curable if the defendant had objected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Egan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.