Skip to main content

State v. Fitzgerald

Citations

  • 516 P.2d 1280
  • 267 Or. 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where the state failed to prove at trial that the two charged crimes were part of the same transaction as alleged, the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to have the state elect between the two crimes
  • stating that “two charges arise out of the same act or transaction if they are so closely linked in time, place and circumstance that a complete account of one charge cannot be related without relating details of the other charge”
  • finding no prejudice resulting from misjoinder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McALLISTER

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Fitzgerald

95 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.