Oregon Supreme Court· 8/3/1982

State v. Robertson

Citations

649 P.2d 569
293 Or. 402
1982 Ore. LEXIS 975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that law at issue was overbroad and not subject to judicial narrowing
holding that Oregon’s coercion statute, ORS 163.275, is unconstitutionally overbroad in part
explaining that, in some circumstances, court may save overbroad law through narrowing construction that is fully consistent with legislature’s intent
explaining that forbidden effect was “frightening another person into a nonobligatory and undesired course of conduct”
stating that a claim of overbreadth asserts that “the terms of a law exceed constitutional boundaries, purporting to reach conduct protected by guarantees [in the constitution!”
explaining that, when speech is an element of a statute that is directed at an effect, the statute is susceptible to attack for overbreadth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Lent, Linde, Peterson, Tanzer, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

212 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.