Skip to main content

State v. Boyd

Citations

  • 533 P.2d 795
  • 271 Or. 558
  • 1975 Ore. LEXIS 537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “same criminal episode” as used in ORS 131.515 is “synonymous with same transaction” in ORS 132.560
  • holding that \same criminal episode\ as used in ORS 131.515 is \synonymous with same transaction\ in ORS 132.560
  • stating that the phrase “same act or transaction” is synonymous with the “same criminal episode”
  • stating that the purpose of the double jeopardy doctrine is to protect the accused from undue harassment
  • stating that the purpose of the former jeopardy doctrine is to protect the accused from undue harassment
  • noting that a failure to join in first proceeding conduct that is part of the same criminal episode is ‘inexcusable and therefore a subsequent attempt by the state to prosecute would constitute undue harassment’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.