Skip to main content

State v. Garrett

Citations

  • 300 Or. App. 671
  • 455 P.3d 979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing the Seventh Circuit’s approach to that suggested by the state, which broadly characterized the defendant’s alleged conduct as “sexual crimes against children”
  • considering the factor that, unlike first-degree sexual abuse, neither sodomy nor ECSA require proof of arousal or gratification of the sexual desire of either party
  • rejecting broad classification of offenses as “sexual crimes against children”
  • noting similar distinction between sodomy and encouraging child sexual abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.