Skip to main content

State v. Ferrell

Citations

  • 843 P.2d 939
  • 315 Or. 213
  • 1992 Ore. LEXIS 243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where a defect in the indictment “does not affect the validity of the conviction on any properly alleged underlying offense, the appropriate remedy is to affirm the conviction on the underlying offense and to remand for resentencing”
  • observing that a defect in an indictment that affects only sentencing enhancement factor did not affect the validity of entire indictment and require dismissal
  • observing that a defect in an indictment that affects only sentencing enhancement factor did not affect the validity of entire indictment and require dismissal
  • where an indictment states an otherwise prosecutable offense, a defect in the indictment does not require that the conviction be reversed
  • “In the absence of an allegation of an offense-subcategory fact [or], the offense is ranked as the lowest-category version of that offense for purposes of sentencing.”
  • “[W]here a defect related to an allegation * * * does not affect the validity of the conviction on any properly alleged underlying offense, the appropriate remedy is to affirm the conviction on the underlying offense and to remand for resentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.