Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/1/2017

State v. Poston

Citations

285 Or. App. 750
399 P.3d 488
2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a charging instrument must show on its face the basis for joinder in the language of the joinder statute or facts sufficient to establish compliance with the joinder statute
concluding that a charging instrument must show on its face the basis for joinder in the language of the joinder statute or facts sufficient to establish compliance with the joinder statute
holding that the basis for joinder of crimes must be alleged in the charging instrument “by alleging the basis for joinder in the language of the joinder statute or by alleging facts sufficient to establish compliance with the joinder statute”
“Because the charges were not lawfully joined in the indictment, defendant was prejudiced in the manner that we identified, that is, by proceeding to trial on charges of promoting prostitution and identity theft that were not lawfully joined for trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Shorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.