Oregon Supreme Court· 2/7/2019
State v. Taylor
Citations
- 434 P.3d 331
- 364 Or. 364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[w]e review for errors of law the trial court’s determination that the joinder will not result in substantial prejudice”
- reaching similar conclusion as to the defen- dant’s two bank robberies
- whether the allegations in an indictment are suffi- cient to satisfy the statutory test for joinder is a question of law
- “Defendant has offered no basis to conclude that a trial on properly joined charges could be fundamentally unfair when the joinder does not cause substantial prejudice.”
- “Defendant has offered no basis to conclude that a trial on properly joined charges could be fundamentally unfair when the joinder does not cause substantial prejudice.”
- describing similar- ities in how defendant committed each bank robbery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DelaneyOregon Supreme Court· 2022-12-22· cited 24×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-17· cited 10×
- State v. Hernandez-EstebanOregon Supreme Court· 2025-09-25· cited 9×
- State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-11-27· cited 8×
- State v. GialloretoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-26· cited 6×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-21· cited 5×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-17· cited 4×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-03· cited 3×
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-06· cited 2×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-06· cited 1×
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-20· cited 1×
- State v. DizerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-27· cited 1×
- State v. Vasquez-ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-19
- State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court· 2026-03-20
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-22
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-03-08· cited 1,718×
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 1,649×
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,584×
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 1,326×
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 1,119×
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,040×
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 697×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- Bean v. CalderonNinth Circuit· 1998-12-15· cited 229×
- Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, WardenNinth Circuit· 1987-03-09· cited 212×
- Don Soon Park v. People of the State of (Jr) California Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2000-01-21· cited 209×
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 139×
- Donald Dickson v. G.E. Sullivan, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional InstitutionNinth Circuit· 1988-06-13· cited 132×
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court· 1989-09-26· cited 111×
- State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 107×
- State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 107×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.