Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/6/2019
State v. Miller
Citations
- 439 P.3d 504
- 296 Or. App. 421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If the state chooses to allege facts instead of the language of ORS 132.560(1)(b)(C) in an indictment, the state must use some language specifically connecting the crimes together, or specifying the crimes’ common scheme or plan.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Egan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court· 1994-08-04· cited 23×
- State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court· 2018-12-06· cited 21×
- State v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court· 2019-02-07· cited 19×
- State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-19· cited 10×
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-03· cited 5×
- State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-28· cited 3×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.