· 10/2/2014
Comcast Corp. v. Department of Revenue
Citations
- 356 Or. 282
- 337 P.3d 768
- 2014 Ore. LEXIS 748
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, when the legislature does not define a statutory term, courts look to the plain meaning and frequently consult dictionaries when doing so
- noting that Oregon courts look to Webster’s Third New International Dictionary to discern the meaning of undefined terms
- noting that, “if the legislature did not give the term a specialized definition, the dictionary definition reflects the meaning that the legis- lature would naturally have intended”
- explaining that we will “potentially also consider the overall statutory scheme in which a legal term appears, as well as the meaning that the term has for regulators who oversee the field”
- explaining that we will “potentially also consider the overall statutory scheme in which a legal term appears, as well as the meaning that the term has for regulators who oversee the field”
- explaining that we will “potentially also consider the overall statutory scheme in which a legal term appears, as well as the meaning that the term has for regulators who oversee the field”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Linder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.