Skip to main content
· 10/2/2014

Comcast Corp. v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 356 Or. 282
  • 337 P.3d 768
  • 2014 Ore. LEXIS 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, when the legislature does not define a statutory term, courts look to the plain meaning and frequently consult dictionaries when doing so
  • noting that Oregon courts look to Webster’s Third New International Dictionary to discern the meaning of undefined terms
  • noting that, “if the legislature did not give the term a specialized definition, the dictionary definition reflects the meaning that the legis- lature would naturally have intended”
  • explaining that we will “potentially also consider the overall statutory scheme in which a legal term appears, as well as the meaning that the term has for regulators who oversee the field”
  • explaining that we will “potentially also consider the overall statutory scheme in which a legal term appears, as well as the meaning that the term has for regulators who oversee the field”
  • explaining that we will “potentially also consider the overall statutory scheme in which a legal term appears, as well as the meaning that the term has for regulators who oversee the field”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.