Oregon Supreme Court· 7/28/2011

State v. Walker

Citations

258 P.3d 1228
350 Or. 540
2011 Ore. LEXIS 641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the defendant’s failure to reiterate her argument was not dispositive where the trial court rejected it
concluding that the defendant’s failure to reiterate her argument was not dispositive where the trial court rejected it
holding that the defendant’s appellate contention was qualitatively different from his exception at trial when at trial he had never referred to ORCP 59 E; instead, he had argued that the instruction was ambiguous
holding that an abbreviated reference to an issue was sufficient to preserve it
noting that “the realities of trial practice may be such that fairly abbreviated short-hand references suffice to put all on notice about the nature of a party’s arguments”
noting that “the realities of trial practice may be such that fairly abbreviated short-hand references suffice to put all on notice about the nature of a party’s arguments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

127 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.