Charles v. Palomo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court's error in denying the plaintiff rebuttal argument substantially affected the plaintiff's rights
• holding that the trial court’s error in denying the plaintiff rebuttal argument substantially affected the plaintiffs rights
• concluding that trial court erred in denying plaintiff the opportunity to present a rebuttal closing argu- ment based on its misreading of ORCP 58 B(6)
• explaining that the fact that the plaintiff made his request politely and did not use the word “objection” does not make his objection inadequate
• explaining that the fact that the plaintiff made his request politely and did not use the word “objection” does not make his objection inadequate
• explaining that the fact that the plaintiff made his request politely and did not use the word “objection” does not make his objection inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).