Oregon Supreme Court· 5/16/1989

State v. Mendez

Citations

774 P.2d 1082
308 Or. 9
1989 Ore. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

limiting discussion to the defendant’s federal constitutional claim where he “failed to brief or argue any independent state constitutional theory’
limiting discussion to defendant’s federal constitutional claim where he “failed to brief or argue any independent state constitutional theory”
limiting discussion to defendant's federal constitutional claim where he \failed to brief or argue any independent state constitutional theory\
declining to consider the defendant’s state constitutional claim where the defendant failed to brief or argue that the state constitutional analysis differed from that under the federal constitution
refusing to consider a state constitutional claim when the party failed to raise any constitutional argument in the trial court and also failed to brief or argue any independent state constitutional theory on appeal
refusing to consider a state constitutional claim when the party failed to raise any constitutional argument in the trial court and also failed to brief or argue any independent state constitutional theory on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.