Oregon Supreme Court· 7/24/2003

State v. Johnson

Citations

73 P.3d 282
335 Or. 511
2003 Ore. LEXIS 506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an appellate court is bound by a trial court’s “finding that a party’s evidence is not sufficiently persua- sive”
holding that an appellate court is bound by a trial court’s “finding that a party’s evidence is not sufficiently persua- sive”
explaining that the allocation of burdens of production and persuasion presented an unresolved issue of state law
holding that appellate courts must defer to a trial court’s ruling regarding whether suppression is required unless “the evidence [is] of such a character or of such weight that the trial court was required” to rule only one way
explaining that the court applies the same standard of review when “a trial court’s ‘finding’ [is] that a party’s evidence is not suffi- ciently persuasive”
explaining that a reviewing court is “bound by a trial court’s ‘finding’ that a party’s evidence is not sufficiently persuasive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.