Oregon Supreme Court· 6/29/1983

State v. Davis

Citations

666 P.2d 802
295 Or. 227
1983 Ore. LEXIS 1342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that suppression is necessary when “probable cause for the arrest stems solely from [an] illegal entry and subsequent illegal search”
holding that warrantless searches are “per se unreasonable unless falling within one of the few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement” (internal quotation marks omitted)
observing that exceptions per- mitting intrusion into home must be “narrowly and care- fully drawn”
holding reasonable suspicion to support criminal investigation does not warrant entry into one’s home
observing that exceptions permitting intrusion into home must be “narrowly and carefully drawn”
explaining that the “rules of law designed to protect citizens against unauthorized or illegal searches * * * are to be given effect * * * by restoring the parties to their position as if the state’s officers had remained within the limits of their authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Roberts, Peterson, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

200 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.