Skip to main content

State v. Rose

Citations

  • 264 Or. App. 95
  • 330 P.3d 680
  • 2014 WL 2978315
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting contention that there was no statutory authority to issue an “out-of-state search warrant” to internet service provider
  • the “degree of specificity required * * * depends on the circumstances and the nature of the property to be seized”
  • the “degree of specificity required * * * depends on the circumstances and the nature of the property to be seized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.