Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/2/2014
State v. Rose
Citations
- 264 Or. App. 95
- 330 P.3d 680
- 2014 WL 2978315
- 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 899
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting contention that there was no statutory authority to issue an “out-of-state search warrant” to internet service provider
- the “degree of specificity required * * * depends on the circumstances and the nature of the property to be seized”
- the “degree of specificity required * * * depends on the circumstances and the nature of the property to be seized”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Bock (A169480)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-31· cited 47×
- State v. SavathCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-17· cited 42×
- State v. MansorWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 18×
- State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-16· cited 14×
- State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 12×
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-06· cited 10×
- State v. RegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-16· cited 7×
- In Re Search Warrant for Records From AT & TSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-06-09· cited 6×
- State v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-20· cited 6×
- State v. DiMolfettoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-06· cited 6×
- State v. C. L. LevineMontana Supreme Court· 2024-08-06· cited 5×
- State v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-09· cited 1×
- State v. SchultCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10· cited 1×
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-31
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 948×
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 683×
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
- United States v. AppelbaumFourth Circuit· 2013-01-25· cited 193×
- State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 171×
- State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 123×
- State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court· 2004-04-29· cited 110×
- United States v. LayneFifth Circuit· 1995-01-11· cited 78×
- State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-08-17· cited 25×
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-05-14· cited 15×
- State v. PatscheckNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-06-07· cited 13×
- State v. LehmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-07-30· cited 11×
- West Side Sanitary District v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1980-07-23· cited 11×
- O'Neil v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-09· cited 11×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.