Oregon Supreme Court· 7/15/2005

State v. Hall

Citations

115 P.3d 908
339 Or. 7
2005 Ore. LEXIS 374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that police seized defendant when they took defendant's identification for warrant check, because reasonable person would not feel free to leave when person is subject of pending warrant check
concluding that police seized defendant when they took defendant’s identification for warrant check, because reasonable person would not feel free to leave when person is subject of pending warrant check
concluding that “it [is] difficult to posit that a reasonable person would think that he or she was free to leave at a time when that person is the investigatory subject of a pending warrant check”
noting that “the state has the burden to prove that the defendant’s consent was independent of, or only tenuously related to, the unlawful police conduct”
explaining that the defendant was seized when the police took the defendant’s identification and radioed police dispatch for a warrants check
noting that the reasoning in a statutory violation case has equal application in an Article I, section 9, analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

239 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.