Oregon Supreme Court· 4/29/2004

State v. Amaya

Citations

89 P.3d 1163
336 Or. 616
2004 Ore. LEXIS 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “problems * * * may arise if the preservation onion is sliced too thinly”
declining to address a defendant’s federal constitutional argument on appeal when, before the trial court, defendant “never developed any separate federal constitutional analysis”
declining to consider constitutional argument that was mentioned only in pass- ing and not separately developed in the party’s Court of Appeals brief
questioning during a lawful stop on a matter unrelated to the basis for that stop does not require independent reasonable suspicion
questioning during a lawful stop on a matter unrelated to the basis for that stop does not require independent reasonable suspicion
considering whether officer’s valid inquiry under ORS 810.410(3)(d) nevertheless violated Article I, section 9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz Balmer, Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.