Oregon Supreme Court· 10/13/2022

State v. Thompson

Citations

370 Or. 273
518 P.3d 923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

distinguishing Fourth Amendment case law and stating that, under Article I, section 9, police activities that exceed what is reasonably necessary to effectuate the investigation require an independent constitutional justification
“Although an error occurred in the trial court, we will affirm if there is little likelihood that the particular error affected the verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
where unchallenged tes- timony already made clear that defendant was not being entirely truthful or forthright, statement implicated by the trial court’s error that could support the same inference was cumulative
in evaluating whether evidentiary error was Cite as 373 Or 213 (2025) 237 harmless, looking to whether the parties’ arguments com- municated that erroneously admitted statements “were not considered significant by either party”
in evaluating whether evidentiary error was Cite as 373 Or 213 (2025) 237 harmless, looking to whether the parties’ arguments com- municated that erroneously admitted statements “were not considered significant by either party”
identify- ing that ground for not reaching a plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.