Skip to main content

State v. Haynes

Citations

  • 352 Or. 321
  • 284 P.3d 473
  • 2012 WL 3525549
  • 2012 Ore. LEXIS 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \we examine the individual circumstances of the case at hand\ (quoting State v. Parkins , 346 Or. 333 , 341, 211 P.3d 262 (2009) )
  • “[I]n analyzing whether a party adequately has preserved an issue for our review, we examine the individual circumstances of the case at hand to determine whether the policies underlying the rule have been sufficiently served.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • “[I]n analyzing whether a party adequately has preserved an issue for our review, we examine the individual circumstances of the case at hand to determine whether the policies underlying the rule have been sufficiently served.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • to properly preserve an issue for review, a party’s argument must be such that “the other part[y] and the court would understand [the argu- ing party to be referencing] a particular legal or factual argument[ ] and also would understand * * * the essential contours of the full argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.