Washington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 7/27/2016

State v. Mansor

Citations

279 Or. App. 778
381 P.3d 930
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the defendant bore the burden of establishing facts relating to his challenge to the validity of the warrant and “[w]hether [the] affidavit was attached to, or otherwise sufficiently accompanied, the warrant when it was executed was such a fact”
noting that the defendant bore the burden of establishing facts relating to his challenge to the validity of the warrant and “[w]hether [the] affidavit was attached to, or otherwise sufficiently accompanied, the warrant when it was executed was such a fact”
discussing the defendant’s failure to establish that the affi- davit lacked a sufficient connection to the warrant “when it was executed”
the defendant adduced “no proof on that matter at the suppression hearing—and, thus, failed to meet that burden” (emphasis in original)
the defendant adduced “no proof on that matter at the suppression hearing—and, thus, failed to meet that burden” (emphasis in original)
particularity requirement ensures that “officers can, with reasonable effort, ascertain [the place to be searched and the items to be seized] to a reasonable degree of certainty” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.