State v. Roble-Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that asking the defendant questions that assumed her guilt contributed to compelling circumstances
• noting that officers “heightened the intensity of the inquiry by putting questions to [the] defendant that assumed her guilt”
• explaining that the “over- arching inquiry is whether the officers created the sort of police-dominated atmosphere that Miranda warnings were intended to counteract”
• explaining that whether warnings were required before police questioning depends on whether the circumstances created the type of atmosphere that Miranda warnings were intended to counteract
• noting that circumstances were compelling in part because the detective drove the defendant from her work to the police headquarters and she was depending on them to drive her back
• rejecting contention that, because the defendant did not repeat all contentions raised earlier, those not repeated were not preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).