Skip to main content
· 6/19/1987

State v. Standifur

Citations

  • 526 A.2d 955
  • 310 Md. 3
  • 1987 Md. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he more important criterion is that a reasonable person in the situation of the declarant would have perceived the statement as disserving at the time he made it”
  • stating that \[t]he more important criterion is that a reasonable person in the situation of the declarant would have perceived the statement as disserving at the time he made it\
  • statements made to person in authority implicating codefendant are “inevitably suspect” because of declarant’s heightened desire to curry favor, achieve plea bargain, shift or share blame

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.