Skip to main content
· 11/4/1996

Farah v. Stout

Citations

  • 684 A.2d 471
  • 112 Md. App. 106
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court correctly prevented admission of statements made by testator that he intended to pay money to appellant upon testator’s death because the statements were offered to prove inaction, not future action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner, Wenner, Alpert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.