Skip to main content

Jordan v. State

Citations

  • 148 A.2d 292
  • 219 Md. 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Our statutes do not define the crime of receiving stolen property, they merely prescribe the punishment therefor.”
  • “it is not necessary that [guilty] knowledge be direct or actual, it being sufficient if circumstantial and inductive, and the receiver believed or reasonably suspected, from the circumstances of the transaction, that the property was stolen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hornby, Bruñe, Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.