Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/23/2002
Roebuck v. State
Citations
- 813 A.2d 342
- 148 Md. App. 563
- 2002 Md. App. LEXIS 216
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that the probative value of bloody photographs that depicted the victim’s stab and gunshot wounds outweighed potential unfair prejudice
- holding, in prosecution for first-degree murder, that photographs of victim’s body were properly admitted into evidence in that they illustrated testimony of medical examiner and were probative as to issue of intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ayala v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-05-23· cited 18×
- State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-06-27· cited 14×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-26· cited 10×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-05· cited 6×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-07· cited 4×
- Newman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-04-04
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-07-26
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-11-02
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-10-02
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 1,808×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-27· cited 931×
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-10· cited 275×
- United States v. Thomas E. Silverstein, Adolph Reynosa, Clayton A. Fountain, and Edgar HevleSeventh Circuit· 1984-07-26· cited 214×
- United States v. Arthur BarrettFirst Circuit· 1976-06-22· cited 185×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-17· cited 171×
- United States v. Carlos Garcia and Jose Luis GarciaSeventh Circuit· 1990-03-19· cited 160×
- McKenna v. NevadaSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 153×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-01· cited 149×
- United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonaldFourth Circuit· 1982-08-16· cited 146×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- United States v. John Katsougrakis, John HiotisSecond Circuit· 1983-08-12· cited 134×
- United States v. Robert Joseph SatterfieldNinth Circuit· 1978-03-22· cited 99×
- United States v. Diane CandoliNinth Circuit· 1989-03-13· cited 89×
- Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-17· cited 82×
- Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-29· cited 77×
- Grandison v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 75×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.