Skip to main content

Bell v. State

Citations

  • 150 A.2d 908
  • 220 Md. 75
  • 1959 Md. LEXIS 475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining in dicta that an argument that guilty verdicts for larceny and receiving stolen goods were inconsistent might have been waived since it was not raised below
  • verdict of guilt on two inconsistent counts, larceny and receiving stolen goods, defective because defendant cannot be both thief and receiver as to same goods
  • verdict of guilt on two inconsistent counts, larceny and receiving stolen goods, defective because defendant cannot be both thief and receiver as to same goods
  • verdict of guilt on two inconsistent counts, larceny and receiving stolen goods, defective because defendant cannot be both thief and receiver as to same goods
  • a general verdict of guilty on two inconsistent counts, such as larceny and receiving stolen goods, is defective and cannot stand because a defendant cannot be both a thief and a receiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hornéy, Bruñe, Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.