Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/11/2002

Gray v. State

Citations

796 A.2d 697
368 Md. 529
2002 Md. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that concerns regarding relevancy and repetitiveness apply to introduction of such evidence
“Article 22 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights has generally been recognized as being in pari materia with its federal counterparts”
\Article 22 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights has generally been recognized as being in pari materia with its federal counterparts\
“Article 22 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights has generally been recognized as being in pari materia with its federal counterparts”
\No independent inquiry into reliability is required when evidence 'falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception.’ \
“[O]ur cases hold that the actual failure to exercise discretion is an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell, Raker, Wilner, Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

115 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.