Skip to main content

Jacobs v. State

Citations

  • 415 A.2d 590
  • 45 Md. App. 634
  • 1980 Md. App. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “when dealing with the rule against hearsay and [the declaration against penal interest] exception[ ] ... admissibility is a question addressed exclusively to the discretion of the trial judge”
  • stating that \when dealing with the rule against hearsay and [the declaration against penal interest] exception[ ] ... admissibility is a question addressed exclusively to the discretion of the trial judge\
  • explaining that, under Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3
  • “[w]hen dealing with the rule against hearsay and its exceptions ... admissibility is a question addressed exclusively to the discretion of the trial judge”
  • “When dealing with the rule against hearsay and its exceptions according to common law evidentiary principles, admissibility is a question addressed exclusively to the discretion of the trial judge.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morton, Moylan, Weant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.