Skip to main content
· 8/11/1983

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kuhl

Citations

  • 463 A.2d 822
  • 296 Md. 446
  • 1983 Md. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “a declaratory judgment action brought by an insurer is inappropriate where the same issue is pending in another proceeding”
  • observing that “a declaratory judgment action brought by an insurer is inappropriate where the same issue is pending in another proceeding”
  • noting the “all too common error of failing to distinguish between” the two hearsay exceptions in a case where both exceptions were invoked
  • noting, in a case with multiple defendants, “the all too common error of failing to distinguish between an admission and a declaration against interest” with respect to hearsay determinations
  • noting, in a case with multiple defendants, “the all too common error of failing to distinguish between an admission and a declaration against interest” with respect to hearsay determinations
  • admissions are the words or acts of a party-opponent ... offered as evidence against him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky and Couch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.