· 8/11/1983
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kuhl
Citations
- 463 A.2d 822
- 296 Md. 446
- 1983 Md. LEXIS 262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “a declaratory judgment action brought by an insurer is inappropriate where the same issue is pending in another proceeding”
- observing that “a declaratory judgment action brought by an insurer is inappropriate where the same issue is pending in another proceeding”
- noting the “all too common error of failing to distinguish between” the two hearsay exceptions in a case where both exceptions were invoked
- noting, in a case with multiple defendants, “the all too common error of failing to distinguish between an admission and a declaration against interest” with respect to hearsay determinations
- noting, in a case with multiple defendants, “the all too common error of failing to distinguish between an admission and a declaration against interest” with respect to hearsay determinations
- admissions are the words or acts of a party-opponent ... offered as evidence against him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky and Couch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.