Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 564 A.2d 772
  • 317 Md. 417
  • 1989 Md. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he proposition that hearsay evidence may be sufficiently reliable to justify its admission where necessary to further the cause of justice, even though it does not fall within a recognized exception is not new.”
  • trial transcripts from a co-defendant's criminal trial should not have been admitted, given co-defendant's motive to lie at that trial
  • codefendant’s statements which reduced his own culpability and inculpated defendant found inherently unreliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAULIFFE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.