Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/28/1994
Simmons v. State
Citations
- 636 A.2d 463
- 333 Md. 547
- 1994 Md. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \the majority of the [Supreme] Court ... shot down its prior holdings that corroborating evidence could be used\
- refusing “to endorse a mechanical test for determining ‘particularized guarantees of trustworthiness’ under the [Confrontation] Clause.”
- concluding the exception is not firmly rooted
- concluding the exception is not firmly rooted
- “The Confrontation Clauses of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights are in pari materia.” (citations omitted)
- witness who is physically seated on the stand but refuses to take an oath or answer any questions at all is not available
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Karwacki, Bell, Raker, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-11· cited 53×
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-20· cited 49×
- Ebb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-14· cited 48×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 47×
- State v. MatuskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-09-18· cited 42×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-09· cited 26×
- West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-03· cited 23×
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-07-30· cited 21×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-10· cited 20×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-22· cited 20×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-28· cited 18×
- Leidig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-08-16· cited 15×
- Roebuck v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-23· cited 11×
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-10· cited 10×
- Matusky v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-28· cited 10×
- Height v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-06· cited 9×
- Griner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-25· cited 9×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-28· cited 9×
- Pitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-01-05· cited 8×
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-30· cited 8×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 1,066×
- Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 734×
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 682×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Maryland v. MoonSupreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 98×
- United States v. Romeo Trinidad Flores, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1993-02-25· cited 77×
- State v. StandifurCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-19· cited 36×
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-30· cited 33×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 33×
- Moon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-19· cited 30×
- Adkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-04· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.