Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 151 Md. App. 425
  • 827 A.2d 850
  • 2003 Md. App. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing it is not an abuse of discretion to reopen the evidence where “[t]he State [did] not attempt[] to deliberately withhold evidence in order to present it at a later time and gain an unfair advantage”
  • recognizing it is not an abuse of discretion to reopen the evidence where \[t]he State [did] not attempt[] to deliberately withhold evidence in order to present it at a later time and gain an unfair advantage\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.