Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Oregon Supreme Court· 5/2/1991

State v. Rose

Citations

  • 810 P.2d 839
  • 311 Or. 274
  • 1991 Ore. LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that no prejudice resulted from an erroneous instruction where the jury completed a special verdict form and jurors individually answered post-verdict questions confirming correct fact-finding
  • concluding that no prejudice resulted from an erroneous instruction where the jury completed a special verdict form and jurors individually answered post-verdict questions confirming correct factfinding
  • holding that civil contempt procedure under former ORS 161.685, amended by Or Laws 1991, ch 724, § 27a, did not expose the defendant to criminal liability and, therefore, did not implicate the constitutional right against self-incrimination
  • reviewing challenge to sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found essential elements of crime proved beyond a reasonable doubt
  • reviewing challenge to sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found essential elements of crime proved beyond a reason- able doubt
  • ‘Something more than a mere coincidence of time and place, however, is necessary to show that the homicide occurred “in the course of and in furtherance of” the felony. There must have been some causal relationship between the robbery and the homicide.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoomissen, Fadeley, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.