Oregon Supreme Court· 12/31/1912

State v. Humphrey

Citations

63 Or. 540
128 P. 824
1912 Ore. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the defendants had challenged six jurors for cause, used peremptory challenges to excuse five of those jurors, and did not use “any of the remaining seven peremptory challenges allowed them by statute” to excuse the other juror that they had challenged for cause
noting that the defendants had challenged six jurors for cause, used peremptory challenges to excuse five of those jurors, and did not use “any of the remaining seven peremptory challenges allowed them by statute” to excuse the other juror that they had challenged for cause
“It is well settled that, although the court sit- ting in the trial of the cause may have erred in overruling a challenge for cause, yet the error is cured by the exercise of a peremptory challenge against the juror in question.”
“It is well settled that, although the court sit- ting in the trial of the cause may have erred in overruling a challenge for cause, yet the error is cured by the exercise of a peremptory challenge against the juror in question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buenett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.