Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Oregon Supreme Court· 5/5/2016

State v. Turnidge

Citations

  • 359 Or. 364
  • 374 P.3d 853
  • 2016 Ore. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of the defendant’s expression of anti-establishment and anti-law enforcement views was logically relevant to demonstrate his motive to plant a bomb that would result in killing law enforcement officers
  • holding that evidence of the defendant’s expression of anti-establishment and anti-law enforcement views was logically relevant to demonstrate his motive to plant a bomb that would result in killing law enforcement officers
  • holding that any constraint on the manner of jury deliberations by acquittal-first instructions “does not rise to the level of a violation of either the Eighth Amendment or the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”
  • explaining that a court examines prior versions of a statute as part of statutory context
  • noting that “[t]he two tests, in all but rare circumstances, lead to the same conclu- sion”
  • explaining that, in Hayward and Brumwell, after evaluating nature of disputed evidence in light of circumstances of crime, court concluded that record in both cases showed connection between disputed evidence and defendants’ motives and intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin, Balmer, Brewer, Kistler, Landau, Linder, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

113 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Turnidge

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.