State v. Fanus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a facial challenge to the constitutionality of Oregon’s sentencing statute for aggravated murder was the proper subject of a pretrial demurrer
• applying principle in affirming denial of demurrer challenging constitutionality of aggravated murder sentenc- ing statutes
• applying principle in affirming denial of demurrer challenging constitutionality of aggravated murder sentenc- ing statutes
• declining to address same argument because the defendant had not presented it below
• because fourth question frames discretionary determination for jury, it imposes no burden of proof
• because fourth question frames discretionary determination for jury, it imposes no burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).