Oregon Supreme Court· 2/7/1991

State v. Stevens

Citations

806 P.2d 92
311 Or. 119
1991 Ore. LEXIS 16
1991 WL 13597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that officers’ actions in searching farm did not undercut claim that exigent circumstances justified searching defendant’s house
holding that, before a witness is declared unavailable so that the witness' hearsay statements may be admitted at trial, the party seeking to admit those statements must make \a good-faith effort to obtain the testimony * * * although it need not perform a futile act\
noting that case was not one in which delay was unreasonable
applying those factors in holding that there was evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that a defendant voluntarily consented to a search
evaluating the evidence gathered by officers over the course of their investigation in determining that an exigent risk to human life existed
relying on its holding in State v. Warner , 585 P.2d 681, 686 (Or. 1978

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

238 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.