Oregon Supreme Court· 7/9/1992

State v. Rogers

Citations

836 P.2d 1308
313 Or. 356
1992 Ore. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[i]n State v. Dewey, 206 Or 496, 504-08, 292 P2d 799 (1956), this court held that ORS 43.160, which states a rule of issue preclusion that has its genesis in the common law, applies in criminal cases”
presuming same analysis ofvenue issue under Article I, section 11, and Sixth Amendment, because defendant did not suggest different analysis under state and federal constitutions
analyzing a proportionality challenge as a cruel and unusual punishment claim
court not required to give instruction in the particular form requested by defendant when the instruction given accurately stated the law
sex abuse charge was sufficiently definite and certain without specifying the state’s theory of the crime or elements of sexual abuse
Defendant \failed to establish the probable value to him of the public opinion poll in light of the extensive voir dire provided or that there was a significant risk of error in the proceedings without the poll\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fadeley, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.