Oregon Supreme Court· 6/19/1963
State v. Elliott
Citations
- 383 P.2d 382
- 234 Or. 522
- 1963 Ore. LEXIS 467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he rule in this state as to the necessity of negativing exceptions * * * was set out early by Mr. Justice Robert S. Bean in the case of State v. Tamler & Polly”
- “[A] defendant is presumed to be innocent of the offense charged and every necessary element thereof until * * * a jury returns a ver- dict of guilty[.]”
- “Doubt is only removed when a jury returns a verdict of guilty, for the presump- tion of innocence is a disputable question which goes with the jury into the jury room for consideration.”
- “Doubt is only removed when a jury returns a verdict of guilty, for the presump- tion of innocence is a disputable question which goes with the jury into the jury room for consideration.”
- specific intent to commit a crime is a “subjective fact * * * seldom susceptible of direct proof [and] * * * usually established by a consideration of objective facts, and from th[ose] objective facts an ultimate conclusion is drawn”
- \No citation of authority is necessary for the statement that in a criminal case in this jurisdiction a defendant is presumed to be innocent of the offense charged and every necessary element thereof until his guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAllister, Eossman, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Denecke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-09-05· cited 140×
- State v. SperouOregon Supreme Court· 2019-06-06· cited 120×
- State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-07· cited 86×
- State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-02· cited 81×
- Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 60×
- State v. StillingOregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 55×
- Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-10-12· cited 44×
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court· 1993-03-25· cited 41×
- Cheaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-07-24· cited 31×
- State v. ZadinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-08-22· cited 17×
- State v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court· 1970-01-21· cited 14×
- State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-07· cited 12×
- State v. KrauseOregon Supreme Court· 1968-10-02· cited 12×
- State v. Sanchez-JacoboCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-27· cited 12×
- State v. AllisonOregon Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 11×
- State v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court· 1967-06-21· cited 8×
- Green Thumb Landscape and Maintenance v. BOLICourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-20· cited 8×
- Wick v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-12-04· cited 7×
- State v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-07-21· cited 6×
- State v. GerlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-02· cited 6×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State of Oregon v. NodineOregon Supreme Court· 1953-07-08· cited 66×
- State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court· 1890-11-10· cited 43×
- State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court· 1953-10-21· cited 40×
- State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court· 1922-03-21· cited 38×
- Farnsworth v. HazelettSupreme Court of Iowa· 1924-06-24· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.