Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/9/2000

State v. Maxwell

Citations

  • 998 P.2d 680
  • 165 Or. App. 467
  • 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address an issue that had not been adequately briefed
  • allegation that the defendant “feloniously” engaged in stalking was sufficient where statute provided that felony stalking required proof of a prior stalking conviction
  • \[A] person is within another's `visual or physical presence' when the person is capable of being seen—whether or not the person is in fact seen—or when the person is within physical calling distance.\
  • “[A] person is within another’s ‘visual or physical presence’ when the person is capable of being seen — whether or not the person is in fact seen — or when the person is within physical calling distance.”
  • defining the phrase “visual presence” as capable of being seen
  • defining the phrase \visual presence\ as capable of being seen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.