Oregon Supreme Court· 10/25/1990

State v. Douglas

Citations

800 P.2d 288
310 Or. 438
1990 Ore. LEXIS 342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the deféndant had a similar motive to cross-examine the unavailable witnesses during a prior security release hearing
explaining that, having exhausted all his peremptory challenges, the defendant could not com- plain because “he [ha]d not object[ed] to any of the jurors who ultimately heard the case”
when considering defendant’s future dangerousness, the jury may consider the threat to prison society as well as the threat to society outside prison
“ Generally, the party asserting a claim for relief has the burden of proving the facts essential to his [or her] claim.”
“Society includes prison society, as well as society at large. When the jury considers the threat that the defendant might pose because of future violent crimes, it may consider the threat to prison society.”
defendant had a similar motive to cross-examine witnesses at a secu- rity release hearing, for the purposes of OEC 804(3)(a), when central issue of guilt was “essentially the same”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Fadeley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.