Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/18/2008

State v. Murray

Citations

174 P.3d 407
285 Kan. 503
2008 Kan. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

district court may be affirmed even where it assigned an erroneous reason for its decision
district court may be affirmed even where it assigned an erroneous reason for its decision
“A litigant may not invite and lead a trial court into error and then complain of the trial court’s action on appeal.”
prosecutor engaged in “limited questioning” of the detective about Murray’s decision to remain silent and did not mention it in closing argument
“[I]f a trial court reaches the right result, its decision will be upheld even if it provided an incorrect reason or engaged in an improper legal analysis.”
prosecutor engaged in 'limited questioning' of the detective about Murray's decision to remain silent and did not mention it in closing argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.