Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/23/2004
State v. Meeks
Citations
- 88 P.3d 789
- 277 Kan. 609
- 2004 Kan. LEXIS 234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding doctrine applicable to defendant charged with murder of witness said to be unavailable
- basing its holding on the Crawford Court’s acceptance of the rule of forfeiture by wrongdoing that extinguishes confrontation claims on essentially equitable grounds
- applying Crawford to defendant’s direct appeal even though the defendant’s trial occurred before Crawford was issued
- applying Crawford to defendant's direct appeal even though the defendant's trial occurred before Crawford was issued
- applying Crawford to direct appeals pending at the time the decision was issued
- recording of 911 call made during a shooting was relevant to “ 'convey[] what was going on at the scene at that moment’ ” and to corroborate witness testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nuss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-21· cited 238×
- People v. StechlyIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 217×
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-27· cited 175×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-23· cited 131×
- State v. Ngan PhamSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-06-16· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-07-01· cited 88×
- State v. KesselringSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 84×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-10-26· cited 78×
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 75×
- Fowler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 68×
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-01-18· cited 60×
- State v. HornSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-06-18· cited 59×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 56×
- People v. GilesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 56×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-22· cited 55×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-12· cited 53×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-06-25· cited 50×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-06· cited 50×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-02-09· cited 48×
- State v. CarapezzaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-22· cited 47×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansFifth Circuit· 1982-01-11· cited 425×
- State v. KingsleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-04-16· cited 85×
- State v. LumbreraSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-12-11· cited 77×
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-10-27· cited 67×
- State v. SaleemSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-04-16· cited 62×
- State v. PlaskettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-07-27· cited 59×
- State v. CravattSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-05-04· cited 49×
- State v. BettsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-26· cited 39×
- State v. BeySupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-01-26· cited 37×
- State v. MurilloSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-06-02· cited 36×
- State v. Abu-FakherSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-10-25· cited 34×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-01-23· cited 32×
- State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-07-11· cited 25×
- State v. BrattSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-01-17· cited 24×
- State v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 22×
- State v. DreilingSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-09-27· cited 19×
- State v. GettingsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-01-20· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.