State v. Kemble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a trial judge may \examine witnesses based upon the premise that one of the functions of a trial judge is to accomplish the full development of the truth\
• noting role of jury in trial process as \the finder of facts\
• statement that defendant never said drunkenness affected memory \until today\ impermissibly implied defendant had post-Miranda, pretrial duty to reveal his testimony
• statement that defendant never said drunkenness affected memory “until today” impermissibly implied defendant had post-Miranda, pretrial duty to reveal his testimony
• outcome dependent on evaluation of defendant’s credibility; prosecutor’s improper reference to defendant’s silence addressed theory of defense
• \'a trial court must control the proceedings in all hearings and trials and . . . has broad discretion and leeway in doing so'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).